• HI!

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:39 am**

pay*lol

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:01 am**

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:05 am**

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:28 am**

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:16 am**

101/100 people would agree

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:36 am**

Married With Children is awesome.

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:42 am**

i am awesome

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:45 am**

Are you married with children?

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:52 am**

I am better, I am single with none.

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:56 am**

So be definition you're not awesome then.

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 9:02 am**

Sobe yourself.

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:47 pm**

I dont trust u abt this one sef

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:11 pm**

Well if my calculations are correct:
Married with Children = awesome.
Vedder =/= married with children.
Thus Vedder cannot be awesome.
And if the theory of relativity has anything to do with this, Vedder is also a communist.

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:53 pm**

Incorrect.

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:18 pm**

About your awesomery or you being a commy?

Posted: **Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:56 pm**

vd and i are common law partners...
tax benefits without the ball and chain tied to your nuts? (except when we roleplay??)

i think we all know who the winners of this one are

Posted: **Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:09 am**

mario andretti?

Posted: **Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:37 pm**

Safersephx wrote:vd and i are common law partners...
tax benefits without the ball and chain tied to your nuts? (except when we roleplay??)

i think we all know who the winners of this one are

Exhibit A

Posted: **Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:29 pm**

Posted: **Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:36 am**

HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!

Re: HI!